Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system - Fixed Based

285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system - Fixed Based LPRs Portion Terri Ray terri.ray@nashville.gov Christopher Wood christopher.wood@nashville.gov Insight LPR, LLC Jason Lynch 1014 Hwy 471 Brandon Mississippi 39042 Motorola Solutions, Inc Rick Carter 105 Westpark Drive, Bldg 3, Suite 200 Brentwood Tennessee 37027 Flock Group, Inc Ryan Elswick 1170 Howell Mill Road, Ste 210 Atlanta Georgia 30318 ✔ ✔ Product Information (40 Points) Methodology and Business Plan (30 Points) Service and Maintenance (30 Points) Round 2 Total (100 Points) Insight LPR, LLC 30 30 30 30 90 127 41.59 288.59 Motorola Solutions, Inc 50 40 30 30 100 123 50 323 Flock Group, Inc 50 30 30 25 85 140 41.18 316.18 Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions 33 25 25 20 70 103 Selex ES Inc 33 25 10 15 50 83 Eye in the Sky, LLC 40 40 Genetec Inc 5 5 NDI Technologies Inc 30 30

Utility Associates Inc 10 10 Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers 35 35 Fixed Based Mobile Solution Scoring Summary Round 1 (50 Points) Round 2 (100 Points) Round 3 (150 Points) Round 4 (50 Points) Total Round 1 4 (350 Points) Deemed not unacceptable, therefore, not shortlisted to Round 2 Shortlisted but Failed to Submit in Round 2 Shortlisted but Failed to Submit in Round 3 Deemed not unacceptable, therefore, not shortlisted to Round 3 Shortlisted but Failed to Submit in Round 2 Deemed not unacceptable, therefore, not shortlisted to Round 2 Shortlisted but Failed to Submit in Round 2 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 1 – FIXED LPR Eye in the Sky, LLC Strengths – Proposal demonstrated an understanding of scope by providing detailed information related to camera installation, garages of entry and exit points, and mounting angles based on project experiences. Proposal demonstrated twenty plus years’ experience on projects of similar scope and complexity. Weaknesses – Proposal lacked specific qualifications, including an item by item disclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Proposal demonstrated limited experience with municipals law enforcement agencies as a prime. Flock Group, Inc Strengths – Proposal demonstrated detailed project experience for a full turn key solution of similar size, scope, and complexity. Proposal demonstrated detailed qualifications, including an item by item disclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Proposal outlined detailed explanation related to project experience solution being linked to the scope details, including on staff implementation team. Weaknesses – N/A Genetec Inc Strengths – N/A Weaknesses Proposal demonstrated prime as a manufacturer that would offer products through re seller. Proposal failed to demonstrate project experience of a full turnkey solution of similar size, scope, and complexity. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Eye in the Sky, LLC Flock Group, Inc Genetec Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc NDI Technologies Inc Selex ES Inc Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers Utility Associates Inc Project Experience (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 Total Round 1 Points (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 1 – FIXED LPR Insight LPR, LLC Strengths – Proposal demonstrated project experience of similar size and complexity. Weaknesses – Proposal demonstrated limited experience with municipals law enforcement agencies. Proposal demonstrated project experience is limited compared to other offerors. Proposal lacked specific qualifications, including an item by item disclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Jenoptik Smart Mobility Solutions Strengths Proposal demonstrated project experience of similar size and complexity for the prime. Weaknesses Proposal lacked details regarding subcontractors and experience perform certain roles to be performed as part of the scope. Proposal lacked specific qualifications, including an item by item disclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Motorola Solutions, Inc Strengths Proposal demonstrated detailed project experience for a full turn key solution of similar size, scope, and complexity. Proposal demonstrated detailed qualifications, including an item by item disclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Proposal outlined detailed explanation related to project experience solution being linked to the scope details, including on staff implementation team. Weaknesses – N/A Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Eye in the Sky, LLC Flock Group, Inc Genetec Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc NDI Technologies Inc Selex ES Inc Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers Utility Associates Inc Project Experience (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 Total Round 1 Points (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 1 – FIXED LPR NDI Technologies Inc Strengths Proposal demonstrated project experience of similar size and complexity. Weaknesses – Proposal contains limited information related to the background of the company. Proposal demonstrated project experience is limited compared to other offerors. Selex ES Inc Strengths – Proposal demonstrated project experience at the federal level and for large municipals. Proposal demonstrated data exchange project experience across various agencies. Weaknesses Proposal lacked specific qualifications, including an item by item disclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers Strengths – Proposal demonstrated project experience of similar scope and complexity. Weaknesses – Proposal demonstrated limited installation experience as a prime. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Eye in the Sky, LLC Flock Group, Inc Genetec Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc NDI Technologies Inc Selex ES Inc Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers Utility Associates Inc Project Experience (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 Total Round 1 Points (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 1 – FIXED LPR Utility Associates Inc Strengths – N/A Weaknesses Proposal failed to demonstrate project experience for just LPRs. Project Experience demonstrated in car camera system that can do LPR . Proposal demonstrated limited years of experience in LPR field/industry for the one LPR technology . Proposal failed to demonstrate project experience of similar size, scope, and complexity. Proposal lacked specific qualifications, including an item by itemdisclosure outlining how the team meets or exceeds the requirements of this solicitation. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Eye in the Sky, LLC Flock Group, Inc Genetec Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc NDI Technologies Inc Selex ES Inc Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers Utility Associates Inc Project Experience (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 Total Round 1 Points (50 Pts Max) 40 50 5 30 33 50 30 33 35 10 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 2 – FIXED LPR Genetec Inc & Utility Associates Inc were deemed not qualified from Round 1. Eye in the Sky, LLC, NDI Technologies Inc, and Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers failed to submit response to Round 2 Flock Group, Inc Strengths – Proposal demonstrated detailed and well organized methodology and business plan which included project management plan and implementation plan. Proposal demonstrated a detailed service and maintenance plan. Proposal demonstrated response times to be 1 hour or less for resolution, less than a minute through chat feature, 20 seconds or less to answer call. Weaknesses – Proposal demonstrated that customer was responsible for running power unless mandated. Product information response to three categories stated not compliant but description provide demonstrates compliance. Proposal included link provided for systems administration or user manual which then requires a login to get to information. Insight LPR, LLC Strengths – Proposal demonstrated detailed methodology and business plan which included a good description of implementation plan. Proposal clearly defined team members roles. Proposal demonstrated response times to be 1 hour or less for resolution. Weaknesses – Failed to provide systems administration, user manual, and implementation documentation. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc Selex ES Inc Methodology & Business Plan (30 Pts Max) 25 30 20 30 15 Service and Maintenance (30 Pts Max) 30 30 25 30 10 Product Information (40 Pts Max) 30 30 25 40 25 Total Round 2 Points (100 Pts Max) 85 90 70 100 50 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 2 – FIXED LPR Genetec Inc & Utility Associates Inc were deemed not qualified from Round 1. Eye in the Sky, LLC, NDI Technologies Inc, and Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers failed to submit response to Round 2 Jenoptik Smart Mobility Solutions Strengths – Proposal demonstrated response times were 30 minutes for urgent and high related issues with 2 hours or less for urgent work around solution. Weaknesses – Methodology and business plan proposal was generic and not specific to Metro’s scope of services. Proposal failed to address risk management plan strategy and out of scope process(es). Overall proposal was difficult to follow due to formatting. Product information response stated compliance with specifications but failed to provide additional description details. Failed to provide systems administration, user manual, and implementation documentation. Proposal demonstrated that licensing would only support the first 50 users then there would be additional costs for more licenses. Motorola Solutions, Inc Strengths Proposal demonstrated detailed and well organized methodology and business plan which included project management plan and implementation plan. Proposal demonstrated response times to be 1 hour or less for resolution. Proposal demonstrated detailed site preparation plan as part of product information response. Weaknesses – N/A Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc Selex ES Inc Methodology & Business Plan (30 Pts Max) 25 30 20 30 15 Service and Maintenance (30 Pts Max) 30 30 25 30 10 Product Information (40 Pts Max) 30 30 25 40 25 Total Round 2 Points (100 Pts Max) 85 90 70 100 50 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 2 – FIXED LPR Genetec Inc & Utility Associates Inc were deemed not qualified from Round 1. Eye in the Sky, LLC, NDI Technologies Inc, and Upstate Wholesale Supply Inc dba Brite Computers failed to submit response to Round 2 Selex ES Inc Strengths – Proposal demonstrated versatility of proposed solutions. Weaknesses Methodology and business plan proposal was generic and not specific to Metro’s scope of services. Proposal included an organization chart but failed to provide description and role for individuals on organizational chart. Risk management plan included with proposal focused on COVID and weather. Proposal failed to provide response time for issues. Proposal demonstrated that there is the potential for risk data breach and that would be completely the responsibility of the customer and Offeror would not be held responsible. Proposal also demonstrated that the Offeror would make a best effort to notify if a breach took place. Proposal included a copy and paste of license agreement rather than providing response to providing description how all licensing and/or subscriptions work for all components. Product information response stated compliance with specifications but failed to provide additional description details. Proposal included a 2018 manual. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Jenoptoik Smart Mobility Solutions Motorola Solutions, Inc Selex ES Inc Methodology & Business Plan (30 Pts Max) 25 30 20 30 15 Service and Maintenance (30 Pts Max) 30 30 25 30 10 Product Information (40 Pts Max) 30 30 25 40 25 Total Round 2 Points (100 Pts Max) 85 90 70 100 50 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 3 – FIXED LPR Flock Group, Inc Strengths – Fixed LPR demonstration resulted in good performance daytime reads on blue plates. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated exceptional OCR accuracy on hits. Field trial demonstrations supported an intuitive user interface and user friendly proposed solution. Fixed LPR field trial showed an automated process for National Crime Information Center (NCIC) hotlist ingestion that had timely updates. Field trial showed the capability of custom hotlists being supported. Fixed LPR field trial showed supports suppressed hits. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated SMS Alerts capability. Proposed solution for Fixed LPR demonstrated as part of the field trial a single sign on with Azure active directory supported and documented. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated device status information that was accurate. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated admin audit log which includes system modifications. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated exceptional device maintenance and health monitoring with notification(s). There was limited need for additional maintenance and support during the Fixed LPR field trial demonstration. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated good dashboard with device status overview. Weaknesses – Fixed LPR demonstration resulted poor performance nighttime reads on blue plates until replacement cameras installed on June 6th by vendor that improved performance with new cameras for nighttime reads with blue plates. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated the inability to schedule reports without custom application programming interface integration. Proposed solution for Fixed LPR demonstrated that date/time parameters cannot be adjusted for read reports. Proposed solution showed an advanced search option as part of the Fixed LPR demonstration but not as robust as other offer(s). Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Motorola Solutions, Inc Fixed LPR Field Trial (150 Pts Max) 140 127 123 Total Round 3 Points (150 Pts Max) 140 127 123 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 3 – FIXED LPR Insight LPR, LLC Strengths – Fixed LPR demonstration resulted in good performance day and nighttime reads on blue plates. Clear & eadable infrared images on notifications received as part of the Fixed LPR demonstration. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated good dashboard with device status overview. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated detailed hit reports with options to categorize by National Crime Information Center (NCIC) alert type by camera. Field trial demonstrations supported an intuitive user interface. Fixed LPR field trial supported the ability for custom hotlists. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated mobile application for alerts. Direct Lightweight Directory Access Protocol Active Directory integration supported and documented as part of the Fixed LPR field trial. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated device status information accurate. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated exceptional device maintenance and health monitoring with notification(s). During fixed LPR field trial there was timely support response provided that was for the most part in person and onsite support. Weaknesses – Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated the inability to schedule reports. Proposed solution for Fixed LPR demonstrated that date/time parameters cannot be adjusted for read reports. Fixed LPR field trial required regular manual intervention for National Crime Information Center (NCIC) otlist. Proposed solution showed an advanced search option as part of the Fixed LPR demonstration but not as robust as other offer(s). As part of the field trial results generated not specific to search request and lacked accurate results. Fixed LPR field trial showed inability to support suppressed hits. Fixed LPR field trial showed single sign on through Azure not supported. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated that user permissions does not provide granular access control. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Motorola Solutions, Inc Fixed LPR Field Trial (150 Pts Max) 140 127 123 Total Round 3 Points (150 Pts Max) 140 127 123 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 3 – FIXED LPR Motorola Solutions, Inc Strengths Fixed LPR demonstration resulted in good performance day & nighttime reads on blue plates. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated exceptional reporting interface that allows scheduled and customizable reports. Fixed LPR field trial showed an automated process for National Crime Information Center (NCIC) hotlist ingestion that had timely updates. Fixed LPR field trial supported the ability for custom hotlists. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated mobile App for alerts. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated a granular and robust advanced search filtering options that included a wildcard search function. Proposed solution for Fixed LPR demonstrated as part of the field trial a single sign on with Azure active directory supported and documented. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated granular user permissions. During fixed LPR field trial there was timely support response provided that was remote with limited on site. Weaknesses – During the Fixed LPR Field Trial there were several fixed camera replacements due to defective seals, water penetration, and/or SIM card issues. During Fixed LPR field trial infrared images often unreadable. As part of the Fixed LPR field trial the system status available through series of menus but no overall status dashboard available. Fixed LPR field trial demonstrated device status information inaccurate. Multiple onsite service calls have been required to revisit hardware maintenance issues throughout Fixed LPR field trial. Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Motorola Solutions, Inc Fixed LPR Field Trial (150 Pts Max) 140 127 123 Total Round 3 Points (150 Pts Max) 140 127 123 RFQ 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Scoring and Justification ROUND 4 – FIXED LPR Offeror's Name Bids Evaluation Amount RFP Cost Point Distribution (50 Points Max) Flock Group, Inc 757,500.00$ $757,500 41.18 Insight LPR, LLC 750,000.00$ $750,000 41.59 Motorola Solutions, Inc 623,823.46$ $623,823 50.00 Proposed Solution/Offeror Name Flock Group, Inc Insight LPR, LLC Motorola Solutions, Inc Fixed LPR Cost (50 Pts Max) 41.18 41.59 50 Total Round 4 Points (50 Pts Max) 41.18 41.59 50 Round 4 Scoring 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Terri Ray terri.ray@nashville.gov N/A N/A Genetec Inc Stefania D'Alessandro 2280 Alfred-Nobel Blvd Montreal H4S 2A4 Canada N/A N/A 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Terri Ray terri.ray@nashville.gov N/A N/A Utility Associates Inc Joyce Trotter 250 E Ponce de Leon Ave, Suite 700 Decatur GA 30030 285248 Automated License Plate Reader/Recognition (ALPR) system Terri Ray terri.ray@nashville.gov N/A N/A Selex-ES Inc Craig Duncan 4221 Tudor Lane Greensboro NC 27410